Case LawHigh Court › Technocraft Industries (India) Ltd v. Th...

Technocraft Industries (India) Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8

High Court 20 Mar 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Technocraft Industries (India) Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8
Date of order
20 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
2002-2003
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Technocraft Industries (India) Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Issue: 2.The following substantial questions of law have been raised in this appeal by the assessee: (a)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, was the Tribunal justified in holding that the entire amount received on the sale of the DEPB entitlement passbook represent profits...

Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of by answering the questions of law in the negative.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1644 OF 2011 Technocraft Industries (India) Ltd. ...Appellant Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax-8 ...Respondent Mr.Pankaj R. Toprani for appellant.Mr.Vimal Gupta for respondent. CORAM: DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. March 20, 2012. P.C. 1.This appeal arises out of a decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 8 April 2011. The Assessment Year to which the appeal relates is AY 2002-2003. 2.The following substantial questions of law have been raised in this appeal by the assessee: (a)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, was the Tribunal justified in holding that the entire amount received on the sale of the DEPB entitlement passbook represent profits chargeable u/S.28(iiid) of Income Tax Act; (b)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law was the Tribunal justified in disallowing deduction u/S. 80HHC on DEPB License sale (export incentive)? 3.The appeal is admitted and by consent is taken up for hearing and final disposal. Counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee and the counsel appearing for the Revenue state that these questions are covered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue by the judgment of the Supreme Court in Topman Exports Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax[1] . Hence in terms of the aforesaid judgment the Assessing Officer is directed to compute the deduction under Section 80HHC in accordance with the judgment of the Supreme Court. The appeal is accordingly disposed of by answering the questions of law in the negative. There shall be no order as to costs. (DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan