Tejas Chhanalal Joshi v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 2(2), Ahmedabad
High Court
08 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Tejas Chhanalal Joshi v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 2(2), Ahmedabad
Date of order
08 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Tejas Chhanalal Joshi v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 2(2), Ahmedabad, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20162 of 2021
==========================================================
TEJAS CHHANALAL JOSHI
VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2),AHMEDABAD
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DHINAL A SHAH(12077) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1MR MR BHATT SENIOR COUNSEL WITH MR KARAN SANGHANI,ADVOCATE FOR M R BHATT & CO.(5953) for the Respondent(s) No. 1==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
and
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 08/02/2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
1This writ application came to be filed at a point of time when theobjections lodged by the writ applicant – assessee to the reasonsassigned for the reopening of the assessment under Section 153C of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 were not considered by the Assessing Officer. Insuch circumstances, the main relief, as prayed for in the present writapplication, is to direct the respondents to consider objections and passan appropriate order disposing of such objections. A Coordinate Bench ofthis Court vide order dated 29[th] December 2021 directed to consider theobjections and pass an appropriate order in that regard.
2Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, Mr. DhinalShah, the learned counsel appearing for the writ applicant and Mr. M. R.Bhatt, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Revenue jointly
made a statement that the Assessing Officer has looked into theobjections and has passed an order disposing of such objections.
3In view of the aforesaid, Mr. Dhinal Shah, the learned counselappearing for the writ applicant would like to withdraw this writapplication with a permission to file a fresh application after goingthrough the order passed by the A.O. disposing of the objections.
4We dispose of this writ application as not pressed at this stagewith the aforesaid liberty. The interim order passed by this Courtdirecting that no final order of assessment shall be passed, shall continuefor a period of two more weeks.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
CHANDRESH
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.