Case Law › High Court › Tejinder Singh Dhindsa,J. (Qral v. Ashis...

Tejinder Singh Dhindsa,J. (Qral v. Ashish Agarwal), He Would Not

High Court 18 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

18 Aug 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Tejinder Singh Dhindsa,J. (Qral v. Ashish Agarwal), He Would Not, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18195-2021(0&M)Date of Decision: 18.08.202 Kamal Bamba ... Detitioner Versys| Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (4),C R Building, Faridabad, Haryana and others wees RESpondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEKEJINDER SINGH DHINDSAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEBEPAK MANCHANDA<<< Present:Mr. V.B. Gupta, Advocate for Mr. S.K. Mukhi, Advocatefor the petitioner. Mr. T. K. Joshi, Senior Standing Counsel assisted byMr. Vikram Bali, Junior Standing Counsel for the respondents. <<< TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA,J. (QRAL) Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the decisiondated 04.05.2022 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India inCivil Appeal-3005-2022 (Union of India & others Vs. Ashish Agarwal), he would not be pressing the instant writ petition. Disposed of as not pressed. (TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA)JUDGE ( DEEPAK MANCHANDA )JUDGE 18.08.2022sunita Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable Yes/No Yes/No

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.