Tejpal Chaudhary v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gurgaon, Haryana And Another
High Court
06 Sep 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Tejpal Chaudhary v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gurgaon, Haryana And Another
Date of order
06 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Tejpal Chaudhary v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gurgaon, Haryana And Another, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.GURBAX SINGH2018.10.08 11:07
ITA No. 158 of 2017Date of decision: 06.09.2018|
Tejpal Chaudhary, S/o Sh. Phool Singh, H.No. 671, Sector-4,Panchkula,Haryana.--.--Appell
Vs.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Gurgaon, Haryana and another|
....Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL |HON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Senior Standing Counsel for respondents. _
For orders, see ITA No. 332 of 2015(M/s Admac Formulations,H.No. 272, Sector-17, Panchkula, through its Authorized Representative
Shri. AJay Batra Vs.Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Panchkula)
September 06, 2018
(Ajay Kumar Mittal)Judge
(Avneesh Jhingan)Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue