In Thane -Ii, New Panvel v. The Raigad District Central Co.op, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Hence the Appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.385 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.385 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.385 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Thane -II, New Panvel .. Appellant
V/s
The Raigad District Central Co.op.
Bank Ltd.Pen, Dist.Raigad. .. Respondent
Mr.R.V.Desai with Mr.R.Asokan for the Appellant.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 25.01.2005.
DATE : 25.01.2005.
DATE : 25.01.2005.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. The
issue raised in the present Appeal is squarely covered
by the decision of this Court in the case of
C.I.T.V/s.Ratnagiri District Central Co-op.Bank Ltd.&
C.I.T.V/s.Ratnagiri District Central Co-op.Bank Ltd.&Ors.-254 ITR 697. Hence the Appeal stands dismissed.
Ors.-
....
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue