Thane v. Mr.jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust
High Court
07 Nov 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Thane v. Mr.jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust
Date of order
07 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
2008-2009
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Thane v. Mr.jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: There is no merit in the appeal and the same is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
ssp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.315 OF 2015
Commissioner of Income Tax-II,Thane ...Appellantvs.Mr.Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust...Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant Mr.Sameer Dalal i/b Mr.Sudhakar G. Lakhani for the respondent
P.C.:
1Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. The Commissioner of the Income Tax passed an order directing cancellation of registration of the respondent under section 12A of the Income Tax Act,1961 with effect from assessment year 2008-2009. The order of cancellation was made on the basis of the proviso added to clause 15 of section 2 of the said Act with effect from 1[st] April 2009. The order of the Commissioner of Income Tax has been interfered with by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai (for short “the Appellate Tribunal”). Interference was made on the ground that the registration which was granted under section 12A to the respondent cannot be cancelled on the basis of the subsequently added proviso to clause 15 of section 2 with effect from 1[st] April 2009.
2Only question of law which is pressed by the appellant is on the basis of the contention that the proviso which was added with effect from 1[st] April
2009 will have retrospective effect being
clarificatory in nature.
3We have perused the said proviso. The said proviso is neither clarificatory nor declaratory in nature and therefore, it cannot have retrospective operation. Apart from that there is a circular issued being No.21 of 2016 dated 27[th] May 2016 by the Central Board of Direct Taxes clarifying that amendment to clause 15 of section 2 of the Income Tax Act will apply with effect from 1[st] April 2009.
4Hence, no substantial question of law arises. There is no merit in the appeal and the same is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.K.MENON,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.