Case LawHigh Court › Thayyil Balakrishnan Pradeepaged 56 Year...

Thayyil Balakrishnan Pradeepaged 56 Yearsaged 56 v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishnaparvathy Menon

High Court 05 May 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Thayyil Balakrishnan Pradeepaged 56 Yearsaged 56 v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishnaparvathy Menon
Date of order
05 May 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Thayyil Balakrishnan Pradeepaged 56 Yearsaged 56 v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishnaparvathy Menon, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. FRIDAY, THE 5 DAY OF MAY 2023 / 15TH VAISAKHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 15152 OF 2023 PETITIONER: THAYYIL BALAKRISHNAN PRADEEPAGED 56 YEARSAGED 56, S/O. BALAKRISHNAN, THAYYIL HOUSE, KANIMANGALAM, PALISSERI, THRISSUR, PIN - 680027BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENONR.SREEJITHK.KRISHNAPARVATHY MENON RESPONDENTS: 1THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR, PIN - 6800012COMMISSIONER OF INCOEM TAX (APPEALS)INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI, PIN - 682036 SR.GP.JOBY JOSEPH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON05.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The petitioner, challenging Ext.P1 assessment order has filed Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P3 staypetition before the 2nd respondent contendingthat coercive steps pursuant to Ext.P1 assessmentorder is being taken during the pendency of thestatutory appeal and the stay petition, this writpetition is filed seeking a direction to the 2ndrespondent to pass orders on Ext.P3 stayapplication within a time limit. 2. Having regard to the facts andcircumstances of the case and hearing the learnedcounsel on either side, I find the request to bereasonable. 3. Accordingly, there will be a direction tothe 2nd respondent to pass orders on Ext.P3 stayapplication within a period of six weeks from thedate of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such orders are passed, all further proceedingspursuant to Ext.P1 will be kept in abeyance. Writ petition is disposed as above. Nsd sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.JUDGE APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15152/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2018-19 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD. 27-03-2023 Exhibit P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2018-19 DTD. 18-04-2023 Exhibit P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2018-19DTD.NIL Exhibit P4 COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 19802/22 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DTD. 20-06-2022
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan