The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dhiraj Kumar
High Court
11 Jan 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dhiraj Kumar
Date of order
11 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dhiraj Kumar, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal.
Decision: 12515 of 2015 and allowed the said writ petition setting aside the judgment and order dated 23.01.2015 passed by the Tribunal in OA/050/00414/2014 and, accordingly, in the terms of our judgment passed today in the said writ petition, this writ petition is also allowed in the same terms and condition...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10247 of 2015
===========================================================
1.Union of India through the Secretary Finance, Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi- 1 Block, New Delhi- 1
2.The Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi
3.The Secretary, DOPT, New Delhi
4.The Directorate of Income Tax
5.The Dy. Director of Income Tax (DRD)
6.The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax
7.The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
8.The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.Dhiraj Kumar S/o Shri Gopal Prasad, at present working as Tax Assistant, O/o ITO Ward- 1(1), LNJP, Bhawan, Patna ITO Ward- 1(1), LNJP, Bhawan, Patna
2.Vikash Kumar Sinha, S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad, at present working as Tax Assistant, O/o JCIT, Range 5, LNJP, Bhawan, Patna Assistant, O/o JCIT, Range 5, LNJP, Bhawan, Patna
3.Pradeep Kumar S/o Shri Vijay Choudhary, at present working as Tax Assistant, O/o Principal CCIT (CCA), Patna O/o Principal CCIT (CCA), Patna
4.Dipak Kumar, S/o Late S.S. Prasad, at present working as Tax Assistant, O/o ACIT, Cir- 2, Patna ACIT, Cir- 2, Patna
5.Anjani Kumar S/o Shri Yogendra Kumar Singh, at present working as Tax Assistant, O/o Principal, CCIT (CCA), Patna Assistant, O/o Principal, CCIT (CCA), Patna
6.Dayanand Kumar, S/o Shri Ram Swaroop Das, at present working as Tax Assistant, O/o JCIT, Range- 1, LNJP Bhawan, Patna Assistant, O/o JCIT, Range- 1, LNJP Bhawan, Patna
7.Manish Kumar, S/o Shri Awadesh Prasad, at present working as Tax Assistant, O/o JCIT, Range 5, LNJP, Bhawan, Patna O/o JCIT, Range 5, LNJP, Bhawan, Patna
.... .... Respondent/s
===========================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S.D. Sanjay, Addl. Solicitor General of India
Mr. Tuhin Shankar, CGC
For the Respondent/s : Mr. J.K. Karan, Advocate
===========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGHand
HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH)Date: 11-01-2016
The present writ petition has been filed by the Union of
India being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 29.012015
passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna
(hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal) in O.A./ 051/00399/2014.
2. Both the sides have appeared and have been heard and with their consent, this writ petition is being disposed of at this stage itself.
3. The Tribunal had merely followed its earlier judgment and order dated 23.01.2015 passed in OA/050/00414/2014 and allowed the original application.
4. We have delivered a separate judgment in C.W.J.C. No. 12515 of 2015 and allowed the said writ petition setting aside the judgment and order dated 23.01.2015 passed by the Tribunal in OA/050/00414/2014 and, accordingly, in the terms of our judgment passed today in the said writ petition, this writ petition is also allowed in the same terms and conditions, as noted therein and the judgment and order dated 29.01.2015 passed by the Tribunal in O.A./ 051/00399/2014 is set aside.
(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)
(Nilu Agrawal, J.)
Arjun/ Trivedi
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.