In The Aforesaid Questions Are Decided By The Delhi v. Cit, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: (B) Whether the return filed by the assessee on 13.10.1995 for the due date of filing return by 31.10.1994 is belated return liable for levy of interest under Section 234A ? " The aforesaid questions are decided by the Delhi -2- High Court in Dr.Prannoy Roy & anr. vs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Income Tax Appeal No.412 of 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax. ... Appellant
v/s.
M/s.Lake View Developers. ... Respondent
Mr.A.S.Rao for appellant.
None for respondent.
----
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 13th December 2005
1. Heard Mr.Rao in support of this Appeal.
The following questions are raised for our
consideration:-
(A)
" Whether while computing interest under
Section 234A a credit for TDS and advance
tax is only entitled and not for self
assessment tax paid ?
(B)
Whether the return filed by the assessee
on 13.10.1995 for the due date of filing
return by 31.10.1994 is belated return
liable for levy of interest under Section
234A ? "
The aforesaid questions are decided by the Delhi
-2-
High Court in Dr.Prannoy Roy & anr. vs. CIT &
anr. reported in 254 ITR 755. The assessee had
deposited the self assessment tax prior to the due
date or filing of the return and, therefore, the
levy of interest was not justified. No reason to
interfere in the decision of the Tribunal. Appeal
is dismissed.
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.