Case LawHigh Court › The Aforesaid Questions Are Decided By T...

The Aforesaid Questions Are Decided By The Delhi v. Cit

High Court 13 Dec 2005 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Aforesaid Questions Are Decided By The Delhi v. Cit
Date of order
13 Dec 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Aforesaid Questions Are Decided By The Delhi v. Cit, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: (B) Whether the return filed by the assessee on 13.10.1995 for the due date of filing return by 31.10.1994 is belated return liable for levy of interest under Section 234A ? " The aforesaid questions are decided by the Delhi -2- High Court in Dr.Prannoy Roy & anr. vs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Income Tax Appeal No.412 of 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax. ... Appellant v/s. M/s.Lake View Developers. ... Respondent Mr.A.S.Rao for appellant. None for respondent. ---- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 13th December 2005 1. Heard Mr.Rao in support of this Appeal. The following questions are raised for our consideration:- (A) " Whether while computing interest under Section 234A a credit for TDS and advance tax is only entitled and not for self assessment tax paid ? (B) Whether the return filed by the assessee on 13.10.1995 for the due date of filing return by 31.10.1994 is belated return liable for levy of interest under Section 234A ? " The aforesaid questions are decided by the Delhi -2- High Court in Dr.Prannoy Roy & anr. vs. CIT & anr. reported in 254 ITR 755. The assessee had deposited the self assessment tax prior to the due date or filing of the return and, therefore, the levy of interest was not justified. No reason to interfere in the decision of the Tribunal. Appeal is dismissed. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan