Case LawHigh Court › The Agriculture Produce Market Committee...

The Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Chhapra v. The Union Of India

High Court 22 Oct 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
The Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Chhapra v. The Union Of India
Date of order
22 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Chhapra v. The Union Of India, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15762 of 2008 The Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Chhapra, through its Special Officer cum S.D.O. Chhapra. Versus 1.The Union of India through the Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Bailey Road, Patna. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Bailey Road, Patna. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2, Muzaffarpur. 3.The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Agriculture Marketing Yard Branch, Sarha, Chhapra, District Saran. India, Agriculture Marketing Yard Branch, Sarha, Chhapra, District Saran. ----------- For the Petitioner : For the Respondents 1 & 2: Mr. Rajesh Mohan Mr. S. K. Sharan For the Respondent no. 3 : M/S. S. D. Sanjay & Gautam Kejriwal ------------ P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ------------ Dated, the 22[nd] October, 2008. Rule. Returnable forthwith. Mr. S. K. Sharan waives service for respondent nos. 1 & 2. By consent, rule is heard finally at this stage. 2. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the order dated 26[th]March, 2007 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 3467 of 2007, Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Araria Vs. The Union of India and another. 3. We, accordingly, pass the following order : (i) The appellate authority (C.I.T. Appeal), Muzaffarpur shall hear and dispose of the appeal preferred by the present petitioner against the assessment order dated 5[th] December, 2007 at an early date. (ii) Until disposal of the appeal by the Commissioner, Income Tax (Appeal), Muzaffarpur and up to a period of four weeks thereafter, no further steps or action for enforcement of the notice of attachment dated 29[th] September, 2008 shall be taken and henceforth no further coercive steps for recovery of the un-paid tax, pursuant to the assessment order dated 5[th] December, 2007 shall be taken. 4. Rule is disposed of in the terms aforesaid. There will be no order as to cost. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J AMIN/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan