Case LawHigh Court › The Appellants Py This Court In Cit v. T...

The Appellants Py This Court In Cit v. Tata Elxsi Ltd

High Court 03 Aug 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
The Appellants Py This Court In Cit v. Tata Elxsi Ltd
Date of order
03 Aug 2017
Assessment year(s)
2005-2006
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Appellants Py This Court In Cit v. Tata Elxsi Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly,| botn I.A.No.1/2016 and the appeal are dismissed. | Appeal dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
- ITA No.528/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 3 DAY QF AUGUST 2Q1/PRESENT| THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON‘'BLE MRS, JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.528/ 201 BETWEEN : 1.|PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX 4BMTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALABMTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560 OOQL 2DTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER INCOME-TAXCIRCLE 12(1),BENGALURUCIRCLE 12(1),BENGALURU . APPELLANTS (BY SRI E.I. SANMATHI, STANDING COUNSEL) AND : M/S KSHEMA TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED>(MERGED WITH MPHASIS LTD)BAGMANE WORLD TECHNOLOGY CENTREK.R. PORAM, WIC 3, BLOCK B, 1 FLOORMARATHAHALLI, ORR, DODDENEKUNDI|BANGALORE -560 048.. RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL [IS FILED UNDER SECTION |260-A OF I.I.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE- THESUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND [TO SET ASIDE THEAPPELLATE ORDER DATED: 27.04.7016 PASSED BY THE INCOME|TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH IN APPEAL PREOCEEDINGSIN ITA NO.1259/BANG/2012, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-2006. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION,|THIS DAY, H.G.RAMESH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: - ITA No.528/2016 JUDGMENT H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)$ Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that. the question raised in this appeal is answered against | the appellants py this Court in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. (2012) 349 ITR 98 (Karn)]. Hence, no purpose will be. served by ordering notice on I.A.No.1/2016 filed for.condonation of the delay in filing the appeal. Accordingly,| botn I.A.No.1/2016 and the appeal are dismissed. | Appeal dismissed. HR| Sd/-'|JUDGE Sd/-'| JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan