The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2(1) Raipur, Chhattisgarh v. M/S Mahendra Sponge & Power Pvt. Ltd. Plot
High Court
01 Mar 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2(1) Raipur, Chhattisgarh v. M/S Mahendra Sponge & Power Pvt. Ltd. Plot
Date of order
01 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2(1) Raipur, Chhattisgarh v. M/S Mahendra Sponge & Power Pvt. Ltd. Plot, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 31 of 2012 and other connected matters.” 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in terms of order passed in TAXC No.31 of 2012 and other connected cases.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
TAXC No. 29 of 2023
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax - 2(1) Raipur, Chhattisgarh
---- Appellant
Versus
M/s Mahendra Sponge & Power Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 76 & 77, IndustrialGrowth Area, Siltara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh (PAN - )
---- Respondent
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Appellant: Mr. Amit Chaudhari with Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocates
Hon'ble Shri Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice
Hon'ble Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, Judge
Order on Board
Per Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice
01.03.2023
Mr. Amit Chaudhari, learned counsel assisted by Mr. Ajay Kumraniproduced before the Court an order dated 15.01.2020 passed in TAXCNo.72 of 2019 and submits that this case is similar to the said case andcan be disposed of accordingly.
2.The order dated 15.01.2020 passed in TAXC No.72 of 2019 readsas follows :
“1. It is brought to the notice of this Court that theissue involved in the case is exactly similar to theone as involved in Tax Case No. 151 of 2018 aswell. The said case came up for consideration
Anu
before this Court on 04.07.2019 and referring to theverdict already passed in Tax Case No. 31 of 2012and other connected cases interference wasdeclined and the appeal was dismissed.
2. In the said circumstances, we find it appropriateto decline interference. The appeal standsdismissed in terms of the verdict passed in TaxCase No. 31 of 2012 and other connected matters.”
3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in terms of order passed in
TAXC No.31 of 2012 and other connected cases.
Sd/- Sd/- (Arup Kumar Goswami)(Radhakishan Agrawal) Chief Justice Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.