Case LawHigh Court › The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax...

The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2(1) Raipur, Chhattisgarh v. M/S Mahendra Sponge & Power Pvt. Ltd. Plot

High Court 01 Mar 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2(1) Raipur, Chhattisgarh v. M/S Mahendra Sponge & Power Pvt. Ltd. Plot
Date of order
01 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2(1) Raipur, Chhattisgarh v. M/S Mahendra Sponge & Power Pvt. Ltd. Plot, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 31 of 2012 and other connected matters.” 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in terms of order passed in TAXC No.31 of 2012 and other connected cases.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR TAXC No. 29 of 2023 The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax - 2(1) Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Appellant Versus M/s Mahendra Sponge & Power Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 76 & 77, IndustrialGrowth Area, Siltara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh (PAN - ) ---- Respondent (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellant: Mr. Amit Chaudhari with Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocates Hon'ble Shri Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice 01.03.2023 Mr. Amit Chaudhari, learned counsel assisted by Mr. Ajay Kumraniproduced before the Court an order dated 15.01.2020 passed in TAXCNo.72 of 2019 and submits that this case is similar to the said case andcan be disposed of accordingly. 2.The order dated 15.01.2020 passed in TAXC No.72 of 2019 readsas follows : “1. It is brought to the notice of this Court that theissue involved in the case is exactly similar to theone as involved in Tax Case No. 151 of 2018 aswell. The said case came up for consideration Anu before this Court on 04.07.2019 and referring to theverdict already passed in Tax Case No. 31 of 2012and other connected cases interference wasdeclined and the appeal was dismissed. 2. In the said circumstances, we find it appropriateto decline interference. The appeal standsdismissed in terms of the verdict passed in TaxCase No. 31 of 2012 and other connected matters.” 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in terms of order passed in TAXC No.31 of 2012 and other connected cases. Sd/- Sd/- (Arup Kumar Goswami)(Radhakishan Agrawal) Chief Justice Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan