The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr v. Infrastructure Logistics Pvt. Ltd
High Court
29 Aug 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr v. Infrastructure Logistics Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
29 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr v. Infrastructure Logistics Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Jose
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.83 OF 2023IN TAX APPEAL NO.19 OF 2023 (F)
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR.
Versus
INFRASTRUCTURE LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.
… Applicants
... Respondent
Ms E. Fernandes, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr Nishant Thakkar with Ms Jasmin Amalsadvala and Ms Linette . Rodrigues, Advocates for the Respondents
CORAM:
DATED:
M.S. SONAK & BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, JJ.29[th] August 2023
P.C.:
1.Heard Ms E. Fernandes for the Applicant, Advocate Mr Nishant Thakkar who appears along with Ms Jasmin Amalsadvala and Ms Linette Rodrigues for the Respondent.
2.There is a delay of 66 days in instituting the Tax Appeal No.19/2023 (F).
3.The delay has been sufficiently explained. The delay is also not inordinate. Though the Applicants could have been more vigilant, this is
not a case of some deliberate or intentional delay to heap some prejudice on the Respondent.
4.Considering all these aspects, the delay of 66 days in instituting this Appeal is condoned.
5.Miscellaneous Civil Application No.83/2023 is disposed of.
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
M.S. SONAK, J.
JOSE FRANCISCO DSOUZADigitally signed by JOSE FRANCISCO DSOUZA Date: 2023.08.29 17:36:29 +05'30'
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue