The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Assessment), Dehradun. … v. Ongc Tel Bhawan, Dehradun As Agent Of Mr. Mamedov Akhmed
High Court
02 Sep 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Assessment), Dehradun. … v. Ongc Tel Bhawan, Dehradun As Agent Of Mr. Mamedov Akhmed
Date of order
02 Sep 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Assessment), Dehradun. … v. Ongc Tel Bhawan, Dehradun As Agent Of Mr. Mamedov Akhmed, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Decision: Following the above mentioned judgment of a Division Bench of this Court, we dismiss this appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL
Income Tax Appeal No. 219 of 2001
(Old No. 67 of 1999)
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Meerut.
2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, (Assessment), Dehradun. … Appellants
Versus
ONGC Tel Bhawan, Dehradun As agent of Mr. Mamedov Akhmed.
...Respondent
Mr. S.K. Posti, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Advocate for the respondent.
Coram: Hon. Cyriac Joseph, C.J. Hon. J.C.S. Rawat, J.
JUDGMENT
CYRIAC JOSEPH, C.J. (Oral)
1. This appeal is against the order dated 19[th] November 1998 passed the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench “A”, in ITA No. 7831/Del of 1992. The dispute relates to the Assessment Year 1990- 91. The assessee is Mr. Mamedov Akhmed, represented by ONGC., Tel Bhawan, Dehradun.
2. The substantial question of law raised in the appeal is as follows:
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in directing to apply Single Stage Grossing up of the Tax perquisites paid by ONGC on behalf of the assessee, instead of Multi Stage Grossing Up, applied by the Assessing Officer under section 195- A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ? ”
3. An identical question of law was considered by a Division Bench of this Court in the judgment in Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut and another Vs. ONGC as agent of Cooper Engineering Services International Incorporated and connected cases, which was reported in
(2003) 264 ITR 340. In the above judgment, this Court held that the Tribunal was right in holding that Multiple Stage Grossing Up of income was not applicable to notional income under section 44BB read with section 195A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
4. Following the above mentioned judgment of a Division Bench of this Court, we dismiss this appeal.
J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 06.09.2005
(Cyriac Joseph, C.J.) 06.09.2005
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.