Case LawHigh Court › The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax...

The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle v. Shri Rakesh Pandey H

High Court 15 Mar 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle v. Shri Rakesh Pandey H
Date of order
15 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle v. Shri Rakesh Pandey H, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the above submission, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR TAXC No. 86 of 2022 NAFR The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-1,, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-1,, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Appellant Versus Shri Rakesh Pandey H. No. 5, Shankar Nagar Ward, Anupam Nagar,District : Raipur, ChhattisgarhDistrict : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Appellant : Shri Amit Chaudhari, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Goutam Bhaduri, Ag. CJ & Hon'ble Shri N.K. Chandravanshi, J Order on Board Per Goutam Bhaduri, Ag. CJ. 15/03/2023 1. Shri Amit Chaudhari, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the issue arising in this appeal is deletion of the addition of Rs. 41,93,900/-made by the Assessing Officer.issue arising in this appeal is deletion of the addition of Rs. 41,93,900/-made by the Assessing Officer. 2. It is submitted by him that this appeal under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 will not be maintainable, in view of the Circular No.17/2019 issued by Memo No. F. No. 279/ Misc. 142/2007 – ITJ Income Tax Act, 1961 will not be maintainable, in view of the Circular No.17/2019 issued by Memo No. F. No. 279/ Misc. 142/2007 – ITJ Jyoti (Pt.),Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes, Judicial Section, dated 08.08.2019, whereby monetary limit for preferring an appeal before the High Court is fixed at Rs.1,00,00,000.00. 3. In view of the above submission, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/-Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) (N.K. Chandravanshi) ActingChief Justice Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan