The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. M/S Bharat Hardware & Iron Stores, Nagpur
High Court
10 Oct 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. M/S Bharat Hardware & Iron Stores, Nagpur
Date of order
10 Oct 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur v. M/S Bharat Hardware & Iron Stores, Nagpur, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence, the Income Tax Appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.31/2013
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur...Versus...M/s Bharat Hardware & Iron Stores, Nagpur
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shri Anand Parchure, Adv. for appellantShri K.P. Dewani, Adv. for respondent
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.DATE: 10.10.2013
Heard.
It is not in dispute that the tax effect in the instant appeal does not exceed an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- and therefore, in view of the Circular issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance dated 9.2.2011, it appears that this appeal would not be tenable in view of the fact that the tax effect in this appeal is only to the extent of Rs.2,85,000/-.
Hence, the Income Tax Appeal is disposed of with no
order as to costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.