Case LawHigh Court › The Assistant Commissioner Ofincome Tax,...

The Assistant Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Circle 19(3) & Ors v. R.n. Laddha, Jj. Dated : 5[Th] January, 2022

High Court 05 Jan 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Assistant Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Circle 19(3) & Ors v. R.n. Laddha, Jj. Dated : 5[Th] January, 2022
Date of order
05 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Assistant Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Circle 19(3) & Ors v. R.n. Laddha, Jj. Dated : 5[Th] January, 2022, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Digitallysigned byPURTIPURTIPRASADPRASADPARAB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYPARABDate:2022.01.1017:07:37ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION+0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 3592 OF 2019 Shree Ambica Gems V/s. The Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Circle 19(3) & Ors. ….Petitioner …Respondents ---- Mr. Deepak Tralshawala i/b Mr. Vishnu S. Hadade for Petitioner.Mr. Sham V. Walve for Respondents-Revenue. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & R.N. LADDHA, JJ. DATED : 5[th] JANUARY, 2022 P.C. : 1.Petitioner is impugning a notice dated 21[st] February, 2019issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). The noticehas been issued after the expiry of four years from the relevant assessmentyear and therefore, the proviso to Section 147 of the Act as then prevailingwill apply. 2.We have considered the reasons recorded for re-opening theassessment. The entire basis is a survey that was conducted under Section133A of the Act on 21[st] January, 2019 at the business premises of assesseewhich was almost three years after the order under Section 143(3) of theAct was passed. Therefore, we are unable to accept the statement ofpetitioner's counsel that the notice that has been issued is bad in law. 3.Petition dismissed. (R.N. LADDHA, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan