The Assistant Director Of Income Tax v. State Of Maharashtras And Others
High Court
30 Apr 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Assistant Director Of Income Tax v. State Of Maharashtras And Others
Date of order
30 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Assistant Director Of Income Tax v. State Of Maharashtras And Others, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Criminal Application No. 499 of 2011
inCriminal Application No. 1313/2010
(The Assistant Director of Income Tax Vs. State of Maharashtras and others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,Appearances, Courts orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Ms. S. H. Bhatia, Adv. h/f Mr. Anand Parchure, Advocate for the applicant.Mr. P. V. Bhoyar, APP for respondent nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM: PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.DATE :6 th MAY, 2011.
Heard.
The learned advocate for the applicant invited my attention to the order passed by this Court, dated 08/04/2011 and submitted that it occurred typographic mistake and in spite of Criminal Case No. 116/2010, in the concluding part at page no. 2 of the order, Criminal Case No. 106/2010 is wrongly typed.
Perused the order.
In view of the submissions of the learned advocate for the applicant, application is allowed
The concluding part at page no. 2 of the order dated 08/04/2011 i.e. 'Criminal Case No. 106/2010 arising out of Crime No. 14/2010........' is substituted by 'Criminal Case No. 116/2010 arising out of Crime No. 14/2010......'.
Application is disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE
*Sandesh
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.