In The Board Of Control For Cricket In India v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Ors, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the same and since no submissions have separately been urged in this proceeding, the petition shall stand dismissed in the same terms and for the same reasons.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 374 OF 2012
The Board of Control for Cricket in India ...Petitioner
Versus
The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors....Respondents
Mr. Nitesh Joshi with Mr.P.C. Tripathi i/by Mr. Atul K. Jasani for petitioner.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for respondents.
CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD &R.D. DHANUKA,JJ.DATED : APRIL 02, 2012
P.C.
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel for Revenue are agreed that the facts of the present case are similar to the facts of W.P. No. 373 of 2012 which has been dismissed by the judgment delivered today. In view of the same and since no submissions have separately been urged in this proceeding, the petition shall stand dismissed in the same terms and for the same reasons. There shall be no order as to costs.
(DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.)
(R.D. DHANUKA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue