Case Law › High Court › The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax Cit...

The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax City-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Ashok Organic And Industries Ltd

High Court 16 Aug 2004 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

16 Aug 2004

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax City-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Ashok Organic And Industries Ltd, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.263 OF 2002 The Chief Commissioner of Income TaxCity-I, Mumbai. vs. M/s. Ashok Organic and Industries Ltd. Appellant Respondent Mr. K. R.Chaudhary i/b. Mr. H. D. Rathod for theappellant. CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ DATED: 16th August 2004 P.C. The learned counsel for the revenue submits that inview of the decision of the Supreme Court inCommissioner of Income-tax v. Indo Nippon Chemicals Co.Ltd., 261 ITR 275, the revenue does not intend to pressthe appeal and the appeal may be allowed to bewithdrawn.2.Allowed to be withdrawn.3.Refund of court fee as per law.(R.M. LODHA, J.)(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.