The Chief Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City-Ix, Mumbai Appellant v. M/S. Mehta Sons
High Court
12 Aug 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Chief Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City-Ix, Mumbai Appellant v. M/S. Mehta Sons
Date of order
12 Aug 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Chief Commissioner Of Income-Tax, City-Ix, Mumbai Appellant v. M/S. Mehta Sons, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: 5.Appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.193 OF 2002
The Chief Commissioner of Income-tax,City-IX, MumbaiAppellant
vs.
M/s. Mehta Sons
Respondent
Ms. S. V. Bharucha i/b. Mr. H. D. Rathod for the appellant.
P.C.:
CORAM : R.M. LODHA &J. P. DEVADHAR,JJ.Date :12[h] August 2004
Heard.
2.The Tribunal relied upon the Division Bench judgment of this
court in the case of Caddle Weaving Mill Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissionerof Income-tax, 249 ITR 265.
3.In so far as we are concerned the controversy is concluded bythe Division Bench judgment of this Court. We find no justification in
entertaining this appeal.
4.No substantial question of law arises in this appeal.
5.Appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R. M. LODHA, J.)
(J. P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue