Case LawHigh Court › The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax Nas...

The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax Nashik-2 v. Prajakta Marbles & Tiles, Nashik

High Court 16 Aug 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax Nashik-2 v. Prajakta Marbles & Tiles, Nashik
Date of order
16 Aug 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax Nashik-2 v. Prajakta Marbles & Tiles, Nashik, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, not maintainable and is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.279 OF 2002 The Chief Commissioner of Income TaxNashik-2. vs. Prajakta Marbles & Tiles, Nashik AppellantRespondent Mr.Vijay Kantharia with Ms. S. V. Bharucha i/b. M/s.H.D. Rathod for the appellant. P.C. CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ DATED: 16th August 2004 Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Prithi Pal Singh, 166 CTR (SC) 187 and set aside the order of penalty. where the tax effect exceeds Rs. 2 lacs. Apparently,in the present case, the tax effect is far below themonetary limit prescribed by the Central Board ofDirect Taxes.3. In Commissioner of Income-tax v. Camco Colour Co.,254 ITR 565 the Division Bench held that where theappeal has been preferred by the revenue incontravention of the instructions issued by the CentralBoard of Direct Taxes, such appeal cannot beentertained. 4. The appeal is, accordingly, not maintainable and is dismissed. (R.M. LODHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan