Case LawHigh Court › The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ud...

The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur (Raj v. Daryave Singh Karnawat

High Court 21 Oct 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur (Raj v. Daryave Singh Karnawat
Date of order
21 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur (Raj v. Daryave Singh Karnawat, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: Stay petition also stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.30/2012 1.Union of India through the Secretary, Finance Department,Government of India, Secretariat, New Delhi. 2.The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur (Raj.) ----Appellant Versus 1.Daryave Singh Karnawat S/o Late Shri Bhanwar LalKarnawat, R/o Karnawat Niwas, Kavdiyagali, Rajsamand.Karnawat, R/o Karnawat Niwas, Kavdiyagali, Rajsamand. 2.Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi. ----Respondent For Appellants: Mr. K.K. BissaFor Respondent No.1: Mr. Vivek Siddh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Judgment 21/10/2021 Learned Single Judge of this Court vide impugned orderdated 14.11.2011 passed in SB CWP No.3782/2008 while allowingthe writ petition of the respondent No.1 directed the appellants tomake payment of interest on the refund amount of Rs.19083/- atthe rate of 15% per annum from 01.01.1998. It is informed by learned counsel for the respondent No.1that the payment of interest has already been made by theappellants. Learned counsel for the appellants is not in a position todispute the above fact. In view of the fact that the payment of interest has alreadybeen made by the appellants, we are not inclined to decide thisspecial appeal writ on merits, however, the question regardingentitlement of assessee of interest on refund amount shall remain open for deciding in any appropriate case. Accordingly, this special appeal writ is disposed of. Stay petition also stands disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J (VIJAY BISHNOI),J Abhishek KumarS.No.33
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan