The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur (Raj v. Daryave Singh Karnawat
High Court
21 Oct 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur (Raj v. Daryave Singh Karnawat
Date of order
21 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Udaipur (Raj v. Daryave Singh Karnawat, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: Stay petition also stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.30/2012
1.Union of India through the Secretary, Finance Department,Government of India, Secretariat, New Delhi.
2.The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur (Raj.)
----Appellant
Versus
1.Daryave Singh Karnawat S/o Late Shri Bhanwar LalKarnawat, R/o Karnawat Niwas, Kavdiyagali, Rajsamand.Karnawat, R/o Karnawat Niwas, Kavdiyagali, Rajsamand.
2.Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi.
----Respondent
For Appellants: Mr. K.K. BissaFor Respondent No.1: Mr. Vivek Siddh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Judgment
21/10/2021
Learned Single Judge of this Court vide impugned orderdated 14.11.2011 passed in SB CWP No.3782/2008 while allowingthe writ petition of the respondent No.1 directed the appellants tomake payment of interest on the refund amount of Rs.19083/- atthe rate of 15% per annum from 01.01.1998.
It is informed by learned counsel for the respondent No.1that the payment of interest has already been made by theappellants.
Learned counsel for the appellants is not in a position todispute the above fact.
In view of the fact that the payment of interest has alreadybeen made by the appellants, we are not inclined to decide thisspecial appeal writ on merits, however, the question regardingentitlement of assessee of interest on refund amount shall remain
open for deciding in any appropriate case.
Accordingly, this special appeal writ is disposed of.
Stay petition also stands disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
Abhishek KumarS.No.33
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.