The Cit -1 Mumbai v. M/S.makrupa Chemicals P.ltd
High Court
14 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit -1 Mumbai v. M/S.makrupa Chemicals P.ltd
Date of order
14 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit -1 Mumbai v. M/S.makrupa Chemicals P.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, Appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1157 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1157 OF 2008
The CIT -1 Mumbai .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Makrupa Chemicals P.Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta i/by Mrs.Devaki Iyer for the Appellant.
Mr.P.C.Tripathi i/by Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 14th October, 2008
DATE : 14th October, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused
an order of the ITAT dated 5.9.2006. It appears that
the matter has been remanded back by the ITAT for
reconsideration. In view thereof, we are not inclined
to interfere. There is no substantial question of law
involved in this Appeal. Hence, Appeal stands
dismissed.
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue