Case LawHigh Court › The Cit-10 v. M/S.common Effluent Treatm...

The Cit-10 v. M/S.common Effluent Treatment

High Court 02 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit-10 v. M/S.common Effluent Treatment
Date of order
02 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit-10 v. M/S.common Effluent Treatment, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3197 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3197 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3197 OF 2008 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO.2225 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO.2225 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO.2225 OF 2008 The CIT-10 .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Common Effluent Treatment Plant (Thane Belapur) Association .. Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Ms.Aasifa Khan for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 2nd December, 2008 DATE : 2nd December, 2008 P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 35 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan