Case LawHigh Court › The Cit-11 Mumbai v. M/S.a.f.ferguson &...

The Cit-11 Mumbai v. M/S.a.f.ferguson & Co

High Court 18 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit-11 Mumbai v. M/S.a.f.ferguson & Co
Date of order
18 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
1984-85
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit-11 Mumbai v. M/S.a.f.ferguson & Co, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATRE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JRISDICTION (1) NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2920 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1215 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1215 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1214 OF 2005 The CIT-11 Mumbai ..Appellant Versus M/s.A.F.Ferguson & Co. ..Respondents ---- Mr.A.D.Kango & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.N.Doshi i/by C.Bayley & Co. for the respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 18.03.2008. PC 1. There is a delay of 284 days. 2. In so far as question of law is concerned, we find that the Tribunal has relied upon its order for A.Y.1984-85 and 1985-86. Revenue has not preferred any appeal in respect of those years which raised the same issue. Nothing has been brought to our attention as to why different view should be taken in these matters. : 2 : 3. In the light of that, Motions alongwith Appeals dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan