The Cit- 11, Mumbai v. M/S.b.r.t.v

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4254 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4254 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4254 OF 2007 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2239 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2239 OF 2007 The CIT- 11, Mumbai .. Appellant Vs. M/s.B.R.T.V. .. Respondent Mr.A.D.Kango with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.Ditendra Singh i/by Mr.K.Gopal for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 8th April, 2008 DATE : 8th April, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant-revenue and the learned Counsel for the Respondent-assessee. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 364 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, delay caused in filing the Appeal is condoned. Notice of Motion stands disposed of accordingly. 2. Place the Appeal on board for admission after two weeks. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)