The Cit-12 v. M/S.f.a.a.jasdanwalla
High Court
28 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit-12 v. M/S.f.a.a.jasdanwalla
Date of order
28 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit-12 v. M/S.f.a.a.jasdanwalla, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.67 OF 2009
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.4026 OF 2008
The CIT-12 )..Appellant
V/s
M/s.F.A.A.Jasdanwalla )..Respondent
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellants.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 28.01.2009.
PC
1. This is a motion for condoning 528 days delay in
filing of the appeal. A perusal of the affidavit in
support indicates that the matter was sent for
drafting an appeal memo on 26.7.2007 but the
satisfactory draft was received on 19.11.2008. A
period of 1 year and 4 months for preparing a draft
of the appeal cannot be said to be reasonable. In
our view, therefore, cause shown does not amount to
sufficient cause. Therefore, motion stands
dismissed. Consequently, appeal papers to be filed.
Refund of court fees as per rules.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue