The Cit- 14, Mumbai v. M/S.sunland Metal Recycling Ind
High Court
08 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit- 14, Mumbai v. M/S.sunland Metal Recycling Ind
Date of order
08 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit- 14, Mumbai v. M/S.sunland Metal Recycling Ind, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3152 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3152 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3152 OF 2007
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1842 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1842 OF 2007
The CIT- 14, Mumbai .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Sunland Metal Recycling Ind. .. Respondent
Mr.S.M.Shah i/by Mr.P.P.Kakade for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 8th April, 2008
DATE : 8th April, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the
Appellant-revenue. None appears for the
Respondent-assessee, though served. By this Notice of
Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 154
days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the
reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice
of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation
of delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence
or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant.
Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a).
2. Place the Appeal on board for admission after three
weeks.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.