Case LawHigh Court › The Cit-14 v. M/S.malhar Information Ser...

The Cit-14 v. M/S.malhar Information Services

High Court 17 Nov 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit-14 v. M/S.malhar Information Services
Date of order
17 Nov 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit-14 v. M/S.malhar Information Services, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, for the same reasons as stated in the aforesaid order dated 8th Octoaber, 2008 the present Appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1047 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1047 OF 2008 The CIT-14 .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Malhar Information Services .. Respondent Mr.D.K.Kanwal for the Appellant. Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 17th November, 2008 DATE : 17th November, 2008 DATE : 17th November, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The learned Counsel for both the parties categorically state that the questions of law raised in this Appeal have already been answered by this Court by an order dated 8th October, 2008 passed in ITXA No.916 of 2008 in the case of The CIT V/s.M/s.Penwalt India Ltd. The CIT V/s.M/s.Penwalt India Ltd., against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee. Hence, for the same reasons as stated in the aforesaid order dated 8th Octoaber, 2008 the present Appeal also stands dismissed. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan