In The Cit-16 v. M/S. Sure Rest Developers, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view thereof appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.929 OF 2008
The CIT-16
: Appellant
v/s
M/s. Sure Rest Developers: Respondent
Mrs. Anuradha Mane for AppellantMr. K. Shivram i/b KSA Legal for respondent
Coram : Dr. S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.Date : 24.9.2008
P.C.
.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant
and the learned counsel for the respondent.
.By the above appeal the appellant is seeking
to raise the following question of law.
There is no substantial question of law. In view
thereof appeal stands dismissed.
(S.J. Kathawalla,J.)
(Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue