Case Law › High Court › The Cit-17, Mumbai v. Mr.jindat K.mehta

The Cit-17, Mumbai v. Mr.jindat K.mehta

High Court 19 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

19 Mar 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit-17, Mumbai v. Mr.jindat K.mehta, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Considering the above, there is no merit in this appeal and consequently appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.12 OF 2009 The CIT-17, Mumbai )..Appellant Vs. Mr.Jindat K.Mehta )..Respondent ---- Mr.D.K.Kamwal for the appellant. Ms.Aasifa Khan for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 19.3.2009. PC 1. The quantum appeal filed by the revenue being Income-tax Appeal No.1257/2008 was dismissed by this Court by order dated 17.1.2009. Considering the above, there is no merit in this appeal and consequently appeal stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.