Case Law › High Court › The Cit-18, Mumbai v. Mr.madhav G.kokane

The Cit-18, Mumbai v. Mr.madhav G.kokane

High Court 25 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

25 Mar 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit-18, Mumbai v. Mr.madhav G.kokane, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For the reasons set out therin, there is no merit in this appeal which is accordingly, dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.82 OF 2009 The CIT-18, Mumbai )..Appellant Vs. Mr.Madhav G.Kokane )..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan i/by K.R.Choudhari for the appellant. Mr.S.N.Inamdar for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 25.3.2009. PC 1. The question in this appeal is the same as in Income-tax Appeal No.51 of 2009. For the reasons set out therin, there is no merit in this appeal which is accordingly, dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.