The Cit-2 v. M/S.hotel Goradia’s P.ltd

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3392/2008 IN ITXAL 2572/2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3392/2008 IN ITXAL 2572/2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3392/2008 IN ITXAL 2572/2008 The CIT-2 .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Hotel Goradia’s P.Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.S.S.Shetty for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 17th November, 2008 DATE : 17th November, 2008 DATE : 17th November, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Mr.Sahadevan who appears on behalf of the Appellant states that he does not have the papers of Notice of Motion, affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion and the Memo of Appeal, and he does not even know how many days delay is there in filing the Appeal. 2. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 202 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)