Case Law › High Court › The Cit-20 v. M/S. Kirti M.jain(Huf

The Cit-20 v. M/S. Kirti M.jain(Huf

High Court 24 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

24 Sep 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit-20 v. M/S. Kirti M.jain(Huf, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.951 OF 2008 The CIT-20 : Appellant v/s M/s. Kirti M.Jain(HUF): Respondents Mr.R.Asokan for AppellantNone for respondent Coram : Dr. S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.Date : 24.9.2008 P.C..Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. None appears for the respondent though served. (S.J. Kathawalla,J.) (Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.) we

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.