The Cit-22, Mumbai v. M/S. Warkem, Mumbai
High Court
01 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit-22, Mumbai v. M/S. Warkem, Mumbai
Date of order
01 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit-22, Mumbai v. M/S. Warkem, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the same or similar reasons which are set out in the order, there is no merit in these appeals which are accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
1) INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.373 OF 2009
2) INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.387 OF 2009
3) INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.47 OF 2009
4) INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.48 OF 2009
The CIT-22, Mumbai )..Appellant
Vs.
M/s. Warkem, Mumbai )..Respondents
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.Deepak Tralshawala with Mr.V.S.Hadade for the
respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 1st April, 2009.
PC
1. The questions of law which arise in these
appeals are similar to what was an issue in
Income-tax Appeal No.1384 of 2008 which was
dismissed by an order dated 30.3.2009. For the same
or similar reasons which are set out in the order,
there is no merit in these appeals which are
accordingly dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue