The Cit-26 v. Shri V.c.george Kutty
High Court
18 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit-26 v. Shri V.c.george Kutty
Date of order
18 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit-26 v. Shri V.c.george Kutty, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATRE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JRISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1500 OF 2007
The CIT-26 ..Appellant
Versus
Shri V.C.George Kutty ..Respondent
----
Mr.A.D.Kango with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the
appellant.
Mr.Subhash Shetty for the respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 18.03.2008.
PC
1. Issue pertains to imposition of penalty. Both,
the Commissioner (Appeals) and ITAT have recorded
the finding that there was amount lying with the
appellant and the assessee has asked that said
amount to be adjusted.
2. In these circumstances, we are of the opinion
that there was no infirmity in the order of the
Commissioner (Appeals) and ITAT and consequently,
appeal dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue