The Cit-3 v. Beck India Limited

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.798 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.798 OF 200 The CIT-3 .. Appellant Vs. Beck India Limited .. Respondent Mr.Parag Vyas with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.A.P.Sathe i/by Ms.Kranti Sathe for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 2nd December, 2008 DATE : 2nd December, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. So far as the Question Nos.1 & 2 raised in this Appeal are concerned, the learned Counsel for the Appellant states that he is not pressing the same, as the first question has already been decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court against the Revenue and the second question has been decided by our Court against the Revenue. 2. So far as Question Nos.3 & 4 are concerned, the learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal without pressing the said question Nos.3 & 4, as the tax effect involved in this Appeal is less than Rs.4 lakhs. Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. Permissible Court fees be refunded to the Appellant as per the Rules. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)