Case LawHigh Court › The Cit-3 v. M/S.hawkins Cookers Ltd

The Cit-3 v. M/S.hawkins Cookers Ltd

High Court 21 Nov 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit-3 v. M/S.hawkins Cookers Ltd
Date of order
21 Nov 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit-3 v. M/S.hawkins Cookers Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, Appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.884 OF 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.884 OF 2008 The CIT-3 .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Hawkins Cookers Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta i/by Ms.Devki Iyer for the Appellant. Mr.A.P.Sathe with Mr.Mandar Vaidya for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 21st November, 2008 DATE : 21st November, 2008 DATE : 21st November, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the judgment of the ITAT and also perused the Scheme of Incentive provided by the Respondent. In its order the Tribunal has clearly given a finding that the expenditure incurred on the aforesaid incentive tour was for the purpose of legitimate business interest of the assessee and as such was allowed to be deducted as business expenses. In view of the aforsaid finding of fact, we do not find any substantial question of law involved in this Appeal. Hence, Appeal stands dismissed. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan