Case Law › High Court › The Cit-5 Mumbai v. M/S.ronak Gems Pvt.l...

The Cit-5 Mumbai v. M/S.ronak Gems Pvt.ltd.,Mumbai

High Court 19 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

19 Mar 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit-5 Mumbai v. M/S.ronak Gems Pvt.ltd.,Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Consequently, appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.11 OF 2009 The CIT-5 Mumbai )..Appellant Vs. M/s.Ronak Gems Pvt.Ltd.,Mumbai )..Respondents ---- Mr.R.Ashokan for the appellant. Mr.A.K.Jasani for the respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 19.3.2009. PC 1. Considering the findings recorded by the Tribunal and section 273 (2) (b) of the Income-tax Act, in our opinion, question of law as framed would not arise. Consequently, appeal stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.