Case LawHigh Court › The Cit-8 Mumbai v. M/S.armour Boi-Tech...

The Cit-8 Mumbai v. M/S.armour Boi-Tech Pvt.ltd

High Court 17 Nov 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit-8 Mumbai v. M/S.armour Boi-Tech Pvt.ltd
Date of order
17 Nov 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit-8 Mumbai v. M/S.armour Boi-Tech Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.167 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.167 OF 2006 The CIT-8 Mumbai .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Armour Boi-Tech Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 17th November, 2008 DATE : 17th November, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. None appears for the Respondent though served. Perused the order of the ITAT dated 28.6.2005. Specially for the reasons stated in paragraph Nos.3 & 4 of the said order the Tribunal has given a clear finding that the factual basis of deleting the disallowance has not been effectively controverted by the Revenue. In view of the aforesaid finding of fact, we do not find any substantial question of law involved in this Appeal. Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan