Case LawHigh Court › The Cit-8, Mumbai v. M/S.standard Tin Wo...

The Cit-8, Mumbai v. M/S.standard Tin Works Pvt.ltd

High Court 13 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit-8, Mumbai v. M/S.standard Tin Works Pvt.ltd
Date of order
13 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit-8, Mumbai v. M/S.standard Tin Works Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Considering the above, there is no merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1194 OF 2008 The CIT-8, Mumbai )..Appellant Versus M/s.Standard Tin Works Pvt.Ltd., )..Respondents ---- Mr.Suresh Kumar with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. None for the respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 13.3.2009. PC 1. Revenue is in appeal on the following question . Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble Tribunal was right in law in allowing the appeal of the assessee holding that interest on borrowed amount for expansion of the business during the accounting period 2000-01 is an allowable deduction ? 2. The Tribunal has recorded the finding of fact that considering the accounting year 2000-2001, the amendment which came in to effect from 1.4.2003 would not be applicable and consequently the assessee would be entitled for allowance of interest on borrowed amount for expansion of assessee’s business. We may clarify that in fact the amendment came into force w.e.f. 1.4.2004, however, that would not make any difference in the case of the assessee. : 2 : 3. The issue has no longer res-integra considering the judgment of the Supreme Court in Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Core Health Care Ltd., reported in 298 ITR 0194. 4. Considering the above, there is no merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan