The Cit-8 v. Hybro Foods Pvt.ltd
High Court
17 Nov 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit-8 v. Hybro Foods Pvt.ltd
Date of order
17 Nov 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit-8 v. Hybro Foods Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3268/2008 IN ITXAL 1906/2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3268/2008 IN ITXAL 1906/2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3268/2008 IN ITXAL 1906/2008
The CIT-8 .. Appellant
Vs.
Hybro Foods Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
Mr.Rajesh Poojari i/by M/s.Mint & Conferers for the
Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 17th November, 2008
DATE : 17th November, 2008
DATE : 17th November, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
Mr.Suresh Kumar appearing on behalf of the Appellant
undertakes to file his vakalatnama within a period of
two weeks from today.
2. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking
condonation of 145 days’ delay caused in filing the
Appeal. For the reasons stated in the
affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient
cause is made out for condonation of delay, and there is
no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on
the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion
is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue