The Cit-8 v. M/S.menon Pharma Pvt.ltd
High Court
07 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit-8 v. M/S.menon Pharma Pvt.ltd
Date of order
07 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit-8 v. M/S.menon Pharma Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1160 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1160 OF 2008
The CIT-8 .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Menon Pharma Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 7th October, 2008
DATE : 7th October, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this
Appeal, the Appellant is seeking to raise two
substantial questions of law as mentioned in Paragraph
No.4 of the Appeal Memo. Perused an order of the ITAT
dated 22.2.2008. In paragraph No.15 of the said order,
the Tribunal has given a clear finding of fact that the
Assessee had not concealed income or the Assessee had
not furnished inaccurate particulars. In view of the
said finding of facts, we do not find any substantial
question of law involved in this Appeal. Hence, the
Appeal stands dismissed.
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.