Case LawHigh Court › The Cit-9 v. M/S.eyeque Investments And...

The Cit-9 v. M/S.eyeque Investments And Trading

High Court 07 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit-9 v. M/S.eyeque Investments And Trading
Date of order
07 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit-9 v. M/S.eyeque Investments And Trading, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.110 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.110 OF 2006 The CIT-9 .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Eyeque Investments and Trading Company Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 7th October, 2008 DATE : 7th October, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. By this Appeal Appellant is seeking to raise two substantial questions of law as mentioned in paragraph No.5 of the Appeal Memo. 2. Perused an order of the ITAT dated 30.8.2005. Specially for the reasons given in paragraph Nos.4 & 5 of the said order and in view of the clear findings given therein, we find that the present Appeal is based on finding of facts. No substantial question of law is involved in this Appeal. Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan