The Cit, Bombay v. M/S.sabara Impex P.ltd
High Court
15 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit, Bombay v. M/S.sabara Impex P.ltd
Date of order
15 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit, Bombay v. M/S.sabara Impex P.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the Notice of Motion dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4331 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2585 OF 2006
The CIT, Bombay )..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Sabara Impex P.Ltd., )..Respondents
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.S.J.Mehta i/by M/s.S.P.Mehta for respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.REBELLO &
R.S.MOHITE,JJ
Date : 15.01.2008
PC
1. This is a Notice of Motion for condoning 1058
days delay in filing of the main appeal. On
perusal of the affidavit in support, we find that
the CCIT-2 recommended the filing of the appeal on
31.12.2003 but the matter was sent for drafting on
29.8.2006. In our view, the period between
31.12.2003 and 29.8.2006 has not been properly
explained. Cause shown is therefore, not
sufficient cause. Hence, Notice of Motion
dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J)
(R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2585 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2585 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2585 OF 2006
The CIT Bombay )..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Sabara Impex Pvt.Ltd., )..Respondents
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.S.J.Mehta i/by M/s.S.P.Mehta for respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.REBELLO &
Coram : F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE,JJ
R.S.MOHITE,JJ
Date : 15.01.2008
PC
1. As the Notice of Motion dismissed, appeal also
stands dismissed. Refund of court fees as per
rules. Certified copy expedited.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.