The Cit, Bombay v. The Travel Agents Association Of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3144 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.1482 OF 2006 The CIT, Bombay ..Appellant Versus The Travel Agents Association of India (AOP), Mumbai-400 001 ..Respondent ---- Mr.A.S.Rao for the appellant. Mr.S.P.Kanuga i/by Kanuga & Kanuga for respondent ---- Coram : F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE,JJ Coram : F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE,JJ Date : 14.01.2008. PC 1. This is a Notice of Motion for condonation of 486 days delay in filing of the main appeal. On perusal of the affidavit in support of the Motion, we find that the matter was sent for drafting to the panel Advocate on 19.9.2005 but the draft memo was submitted on 14.7.2006. The delay of 10 months in drafting the appeal memo is highly unreasonable. In the circumstances, cause shown is not sufficient cause. Notice of Motion dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J) (R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.1482 OF 2006 The CIT, Bombay ..Appellant Versus The Travel Agents Association of India (AOP) Mumbai-400 001 ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.S.J.Mehta for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE,JJ Date : 14.01.2008. PC 1. As the Notice of Motion dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. Refund of court fees as per rules. Certified copy expedited. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)