The Cit Bombay v. V.m.sheth
High Court
18 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit Bombay v. V.m.sheth
Date of order
18 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit Bombay v. V.m.sheth, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATRE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JRISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1163 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.442 OF 2005
The CIT Bombay ..Appellant
Versus
V.M.Sheth ..Respondent
----
Mr.S.M.Shah & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.S.J.Mehta for the respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 18.03.2008.
PC
1. As the tax incidence is less than Rs.4.00 lakhs,
learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Motion
alongwith the Appeal. Motion alongwith Appeal
dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of court fees as per
rules. Certified copy expedited.
2. The questions of law, if any, is kept open for
consideration in appropriate case.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue