The Cit Central-Iii Mumbai v. M/S.excel Industries Ltd
High Court
26 Mar 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit Central-Iii Mumbai v. M/S.excel Industries Ltd
Date of order
26 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit Central-Iii Mumbai v. M/S.excel Industries Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.303 OF 2005
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1613 OF 2004
The CIT Central-III Mumbai ..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Excel Industries Ltd., ..Respondents
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Ms.Vasanti B.Patel for the respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 26th March, 2008.
PC
1. There is a delay of 172 days in filing the
appeal. Considering the cause shown, delay condoned
subject to the appellant paying to the respondents
cost quantified at Rs.5000/- within 12 weeks from
today and also remove office objections within 12
weeks from today. Office to register the appeal.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1613 OF 2004
. Admit on questions-(a) and (b) of paragraph-4
subject to the appellent comply with the order
passed in Notice of Motion No.303/2005. Respondents
waives service.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue