Case LawHigh Court › The Cit Central-Iii v. M/S.united Liner...

The Cit Central-Iii v. M/S.united Liner Agencies(Stevedores

High Court 12 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit Central-Iii v. M/S.united Liner Agencies(Stevedores
Date of order
12 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit Central-Iii v. M/S.united Liner Agencies(Stevedores, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.901 OF 2007 The CIT Central-III ..Appellant Versus M/s.United Liner Agencies(Stevedores)..Respondent ---- Mr.B.M.Chatterji @ Mrs.P.P.Bhosale and Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.P.R.Toprani with Usha I. Dalal for respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 12.03.2008. PC 1. The Tribunal in the impugned order in paragraph-18 has held as under :- " It is therefore apparent that the reasons have been recorded without careful examination of the material gathered at the time of survey and any further inquiry thereafter. We therefore hold that initiation of proceedings under section 147 has been made based on the material, if any, that has no specific nexus with the assessment years under consideration befure us." 2. These are purely findings of fact. The question of law as framed would not arise and consequently, appeal dismissed. : 2 : (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan